Landlord Fined Over Unauthorised Property Extension in Uxbridge

A landlord and his property management company have been fined a total of £7,589 for failing to demolish an unauthorised home extension. The case highlights the importance of adhering to planning regulations and enforcement notices for landlords and property professionals.

Background to the Enforcement Action

Saad Ahmad, a landlord from The Larches, Uxbridge, appeared at Uxbridge Magistrates’ Court after breaching planning control regulations. The issue concerned an unauthorised front porch and first-floor side room extension at his property located at 15 Lynhurst Crescent.

Following complaints from local residents, planning enforcement officers investigated the property in November 2022 and identified the unauthorised works. Ahmad subsequently submitted a retrospective planning application in February 2023, which was refused by the local authority.

Planning Appeal and Enforcement Notices

Ahmad appealed the refusal, but the Planning Inspectorate dismissed his appeal in September 2023. The Inspectorate described the extension as having an “unattractive box-like and blocky outline which is out of rhythm with other dwellings” in the area.

Despite being ordered by enforcement officers to remove the unauthorised extension within 28 days, Ahmad did not comply. Instead, he submitted an amended retrospective application with changes to the roof design, which was also refused in May 2024.

In response, Hillingdon Council issued a planning enforcement notice in August 2024, requiring the removal of the extension by December 2024. As of now, the extension has not been fully removed, and the council continues to engage with Ahmad to ensure compliance.

Legal Consequences and Fines

At court, Ahmad admitted to breaching planning control regulations and failing to comply with the enforcement notice. His company, Optimum Asset Investments Ltd, was fined £3,000 and ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £1,200, as well as prosecution costs of £3,363 to Hillingdon Council.

Ahmad himself received an 18-month conditional discharge and was ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £26. The total financial penalty imposed amounts to £7,589.

Implications for Landlords and Property Professionals

This case serves as a clear reminder to landlords, property managers, and businesses about the importance of following proper planning procedures when undertaking construction or alterations to rental properties. Failure to obtain the necessary permissions or to comply with enforcement notices can result in significant fines and legal action.

Planning laws exist to protect residents’ safety and the local environment. Councils have the authority to take robust enforcement action against unauthorised developments, including prosecution and financial penalties. Landlords should ensure that any works carried out on their properties comply fully with planning regulations and that retrospective applications are submitted promptly if needed.

Council Statement

Councillor Steve Tuckwell, cabinet member for planning, housing and growth, emphasised the importance of compliance. He stated, “Planning laws are in place to keep residents safe and protect the environment, and if required, we will not hesitate to take robust action to enforce them.”

Key Takeaways for Landlords

• Always check whether planning permission is required before undertaking any property alterations.
• Submit planning applications in a timely manner and ensure compliance with any conditions or enforcement notices.
• Engage with local planning authorities proactively to avoid enforcement action.
• Understand that failure to comply with planning laws can lead to fines, legal costs, and damage to reputation.

Landlords and agents can find further guidance on planning compliance and enforcement on Landlord Association.